
todayAugust 31, 2020 17
Does mandatory workplace COVID-19 testing make sense for your organization?
In normal times, requiring employees to undergo medical testing of any kind is highly problematic. However, privacy, human rights and other regulators across the country have acknowledged that workplace COVID-19 testing may be justified during the pandemic under certain conditions. Here are 11 FAQs summing up the current ground rules for workplace testing.
ANSWER: Yes, provided that:
Point of Clarification: “Requiring” testing doesn’t mean physically forcing employees to undergo testing; it just means that you can order them to leave or prevent them from reporting to work if they refuse to be tested.
ANSWER: As of August 18, no Canadian public health agency has specifically addressed this question. So, the best source of guidance comes from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), which says workplace testing for non-healthcare workers is appropriate in 5 situations:
These rules would also likely apply in Canada, with the possible exception of #3.
Because it’s the most privacy-intrusive, requiring all employees to be tested even if they don’t have symptoms is the hardest to justify and would likely be allowed only in workplaces where social distancing can’t be maintained or in remote settings such as offshore oil platforms where employees can’t get immediate treatment.
ANSWER: Yes. There are 2 basic kinds of COVID-19 tests currently available:
While antibody tests are much faster, they’re far less accurate than the molecular RT-PCR tests. As a result, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, i.e., the U.S. equivalent of the provincial human rights commissions, has made it clear that employers aren’t allowed to use antibody tests for COVID-19 screening. The same reasoning would seem to apply in this country. But so far at least, none of the Canadian human rights commissions have made a distinction between RT-PCR and antibody testing for purposes of workplace screening.
ANSWER: It depends on whether the employee has symptoms:
The Symptomatic: Testing should be required immediately after employees exhibit COVID-19 symptoms or are discovered to have had recent exposure. Employees should also be sent home until their test results.
The Asymptomatic: Asymptomatic employees should be tested before they report to work. The best solution would be to test employees right at the site and get instant results. But current testing technology doesn’t allow for this. RT-PCR tests must be done by an offsite testing lab using special instruments to isolate the patient’s RNA and take about 48 hours to process—or even a week or more if the lab is backed up. This obviously reduces the reliability of the test results because of the risk that employees will develop the virus after they’re tested and before the results are reported. This is something you need to consider in determining whether testing makes sense for your organization.
ANSWER: It would be great if you could test employees each day when they arrive for work and clear them based on their test results a la temperature screening. But testing doesn’t work this way. So, you need to determine how frequently testing needs to be repeated based on the risks involved and factor the minimum 48-hour delay into the process.
Exception: Employees with symptoms and recent exposure need to be tested immediately, regardless of when they were last tested.
ANSWER: Yes. There’s currently no scientific proof that people who’ve had COVID-19 can’t get it again. Consequently, you shouldn’t exempt employees from your testing requirements simply because they’ve already had COVID-19.
ANSWER: Unless you’re an accredited healthcare organization, you can’t do COVID-19 testing yourself but must hire a qualified lab company to do it for you. Because testing services are in such high demand right now, you might have to pay a premium rate.
ANSWER: That shouldn’t be an issue if the testing company collects samples right at your site. But if employees have to go to an offsite lab to be tested, your reimbursement obligations will depend on the terms of your current employment contracts, collective agreements and health plans. In other words, we’re not aware of any OHS or public health laws that require employers to pay their employees for their time getting COVID-19 tested.
ANSWER: Privacy and human rights commissions have made it clear that employers need to be open and transparent about their testing policies and provide employees information about:
ANSWER: Immediately send the employee home and require him/her to self-isolate for as long as required under current public health guidelines. The one thing you cannot do is terminate or discipline the employee for testing positive.
ANSWER: In most jurisdictions, employers must report workplace COVID-19 cases to local health officials. You also need to notify employees, contractors, clients and guests who’ve had recent and close contact with the employee in the workplace of the case and advise them to be tested. But be careful to limit the disclosure to the minimum information necessary to alert notice recipients to the situation and fact that they’re at risk without disclosing the employee’s name or other personal information that may be used to identify him/her.
Written by: covidconf
labelOHS Compliance todayAugust 31, 2020
The problems with testing and the legal obstacles you must navigate to implement it. Before You Begin: Why COVID-19 Testing May Not Be Such a Great Idea Picture an airport [...]
labelOHS Compliance todayAugust 31, 2020
labelOHS Compliance todayAugust 31, 2020
Copyright 2020 SafetyNow
Post comments (0)